Planet B Redux

In my post “Planet B” I lamented the Evangelical “Temporary Earth” Theology.  As if on cue, Santorum spewed this little ditty on the national campaign scene:

“…Energy, this idea that man is here to serve the Earth, as opposed to husband its resources and be good stewards of the Earth. And I think that is a phony ideal. I don’t believe that that’s what we’re here to do – that man is here to use the resources and use them wisely, to care for the Earth, to be a steward of the Earth, but we’re not here to serve the Earth…The Earth is not the objective.  Man is the objective. I think a lot of radical environmentalists have it upside-down.”

Man is the objective?  Really?

This is exactly what I’m talking about.  This dualism, as though we’re separate from the earth, is a poison, and is a gross misunderstanding of nature and our place in it.  This is what archaic religious thinking does – it distorts one’s view of reality and prevents them properly assessing a situation.

The first fallacy, which runs throughout the quote, is that Man is “here” to “do” something.  The fallacy of a defined purpose.  Santorum takes on the the biblical ideal that a supernatural being put us on earth for some overriding purpose, part of which includes being “stewards” of the earth.  That is a particular conceit that elevates man beyond his nature as a highly intelligent animal.  He becomes a special, separate sort of creature, rather than being inextricably bound to the fate of his environment.

This leads to the second fallacy – a fallacy of superiority.  Rather than being an integral and inseparable part of nature, he is superior.  In that superiority he is then somehow authorized to “use” the earth and its resources as he sees fit.  His needs are elevated above the needs of the rest of nature, because everything is here for his use.  When the question is before Santorum to decide whether to do what’s most beneficial for the environment as a whole, or what is, perhaps in the short term, more beneficial to man, he will choose man.  After all, we’re not here to serve the environment.

The third fallacy is slightly more subtle, but is the most heinous part of this destructive attitude – that the definition of mankind’s use of resources includes the industrial consumption of resources to enrich corporations and their shareholders.  After all, we’re not talking about the use of water for sharecropping farms and communes.  We’re talking about energy.  We’re talking about the consumption of non-renewable resources.  Nobody cares if Ricky builds a 100 acre sun farm and uses the power to charge up a small cadre of robots programmed to tell him how clever he is when activated by a motion sensor every time he walks by.  He’s defending the right of corporations to be free to drill wherever the hell they want.  We’re here to steward, we’re superior and authorized to use the resources to benefit us as opposed to the rest of nature, nature’s here to serve us, and us = big energy corporations that want to run giant oil pipelines through your neighborhood.

The long term ramifications of these beliefs don’t matter.  Why?

Because Jesus is coming back.  He’ll have a kingdom on earth, then the earth will be replaced with a new one.  We’re not dependent on this planet and the health of its environment.  We’re not part of the cycle of nature.  We’re separate.  We get to use all this stuff for ourselves until Jesus gets back.  How wasteful would it be to not suck the last drop of oil out of the earth the day before he gets back?  That’s called lost opportunity, folks.

This dominionist sort of philosophy is a drag on human evolution.  It is a massive hindrance to the betterment of mankind and to the preservation of a healthy ecosphere so that we can preserve our kind and nature for as long as possible.  This world is finite.  It isn’t forever.  There are no guarantees.  Nobody is coming back to rescue us when we screw it up.  The sooner these people get that through their thick skulls, the sooner we can get to work on the reality of climate change and environmental care.

Further reading:

5 thoughts on “Planet B Redux

  1. I no longer believe in the concept, but I am an expert in the concept and qualified to criticize it and all the poor deluded fools who still believe. It’s not possible that I no longer believe because I didn’t correctly or completely understand…nope, I am an expert because I say so, and only an expert could make that assertion.

    • I’m completely committed to a narrow view full of unsubstantiated presupposition, which is my only scope of understanding, rejecting all other rational input into the conversation, so only my understanding is valid, and I can’t imagine how someone who has viewed it from more than one viewpoint might have something to say about it. Really?

  2. “This leads to the second fallacy – a fallacy of superiority.”

    Parallel to this is the prevalent Evangelical view of Israel – “We LOVE God’s chosen people (…right up to the end, when the sheep-wheats will be divided from the goat-chaffs and the latter’s blood will run up to the horse’s bridle in the valley Meggido).

    Selah (I think that means “good times,” right?)

  3. There is also the problem of the infallibility of his beliefs.
    If he is wrong, we will die in a cesspool of our own making. Or perhaps worse, be forced to live in a cesspool of our own making. A reasonable person would look at his view and say we shouldn’t follow that because if we are wrong, the downside is simply to terrible to contemplate. So we will hedge our bets and be good stewards.

    But religion tends to place barriers against any possible doubt. An example is the retired Navy Anglican Irishman who’s comments I read on your about page. Never a hint of doubt. There are over 30,000 Christian sects, but they all believe they have the One True Sect of the One True Religion, every other one is wrong.

    It can be frightening to read the beliefs of the majority of Republicans who are running for the position of President of the USA, the most powerful country on earth, with huge stockpile of nuclear weapons and an armed forces that dwarfs the next ten largest. Many of these Republicans believe in the end times. Or say they do. The possibility of one of them being commander and chief scares the hell out of me. As does their unswerving hatred of Obama.

    For people who profess to follow Jesus, the supposed man of peace, they certainly seem to have a great deal of hate in them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s