Why do I do this? Why do I strive with believers who sometimes seem impervious to logic? Why do I care?
This appeared in my Facebook feed yesterday. I don’t think Pastor Chuck knew I saw it.
There were a number of things that troubled me about this post, honestly. But the item I’ll focus on is this:
“He is dear to me – but is quite outspoken in his atheism.”
How interesting. I had no idea that, while I was supposed to let my light shine, and not hide it “under a bushel/bowl” (Matt 5:15-16) as a Christian, now having left that behind, I’m supposed to shut up and not say anything? My being outspoken is a problem? Continue reading
At the risk of beating a dead horse, there’s one more point of interest I’d like to visit from my latest interaction with Pastor Chuck. During his latest ad hom, he said the following:
No matter which expert or scholar I bring into the equation of our discussions, you immediately presume to know more and immediately rush into a character-bashing mode.
Apparently it ticks him off that I seem to think I have all the answers.
I don’t have all the answers. And in fact, unlike Christians, I don’t even think I have all the answers. But you know what I do have the answers to? Continue reading
In my article So Sorry, So Sad, I addressed the issue of a particularly Christian disease, albeit one that infects religious folks of many stripes. Last time it was a sadly aggressive Anglican Priest (go figure.)
Now somebody cut from the cloth of science, apparently, has fallen victim. This was from a friend of my former Pastor, Chuck. Chuck had asked “Bob” to peruse my site, seeking his assistance in understanding some Quantum Physics concepts central to our discussion of R.C. Sproul’s book, Not a Chance.
He did chat a little about that, which I addressed here, but then he leaped across the line and said this: Continue reading
So I finally got around to revamping the look of Why I No Longer Believe. I set up a new theme, spent actual money on header graphics (wut!?) and tightened up the main page with excerpts of all but the shortest entries.
What do y’all think?
I think it’s sex-aayyyyy…
As my little cadre of readers know, my former pastor Chuck and I are engaged in a little debate around R.C. Sproul’s Not a Chance, in which Sproul takes on the idea of Chance as a factor in Existence. In doing so he contacted a scientist buddy or two, one of whom at least is also a bible-believing Christian, it seems. This guy, “Bob,” provided some commentary after reading through my blog that was half interesting, half a festering lump of offensive arrogance.
I’ll deal with the latter in a subsequent post, but I’m going to reproduce his comments here then address the points he brings up to see if they hold water. Continue reading
Well, in order to present a better dialogue, my former pastor and I are going to read through Sproul’s Not a Chance, before reviewing/commenting further. Hopefully that will make for a more lively discussion and a deeper dive than just my own take on the material.
In the meantime I’ll be doing a couple things. First, I’m doing some light reading on Chance and Probability in Quantum Physics, as well as boning up on the topic in general. This is also requiring me to do a brief refresher on Linear Algebra, which is, believe it or not, rather fun.
Yeah, I’m a sicko. Continue reading
This post will be relatively brief, as there isn’t much going on in Chapter 2 save Sproul doing his best to stuff as much straw into his strawman as he can before he begins tilting at the windmill of Quantum Physics. That said, there a few items in this chapter I would like to address.
Sproul’s main aim in this chapter is to imply… well, never mind, he asserts that the entire global community of scientists has abandoned logic and reason, and that it’s up to philosophers like himself to bring them around. Good thing he’s not arrogant about it or anything, eh? Continue reading
Back in 2007 a book landed in the front windows of bookstores across the country, announcing that the “world’s most notorious atheist” had changed his mind and now believed in “God.”
This atheist’s name? Antony Flew.
Atheists and apologetics-minded believers everywhere turned to each other and said:
Well, throughout the second half of the 20th century, Mister Flew had written some philosophical papers in support of atheism and had broken some new ground in the conversation. To be fair, he was somewhat prototypical to Dawkins, Hitchens, and Dennett. But most notorious? The hyperbole runs thick sometimes. Continue reading
Let’s dive into chapter one.
First, I’m not going to hide my disdain for what I’ve read so far. I’m not an expert in physics by any stretch. For that reason I expected, or at least hoped, to be challenged by Sproul’s presentation.
Sadly, that is not the case.
In this first chapter, Sproul attempts to completely redefine chance to serve his preconceptions, then disparage science and scientists based on those preconceptions, though perhaps misconceptions is a better word. Continue reading
After a flurry of writing, I’ve completed telling the story of my Christian experience as best I can.
I hope you find it interesting. I hope seekers find something they can identify with, realize that they aren’t the only ones walking the uncertain path of doubt.
I hope Christians will read it and recognize themselves in there, and at least see that there just might be some things they should consider.
I hope those who are already out, like me, will be encouraged that more and more of us are finding our way out of that pretend world and into the real one, ready to make a difference. Continue reading